The new implementation of select_xkb_events apparently misconfigures
the server. This commit does a temporary fix by just reverting it to its
previous implementation.
This is temporary until I can figure out what Xlib is doing behind the
scenes or until I read xkbproto.pdf.
Fixes: #3079
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <dev@notgull.net>
They are safe, since they use the rust `std::env` stuff. Making them
safe lets downstream to determine that `std::env` is used and not the
`libc` env manipulation routines, which are unsafe.
* Make Linux platforms less dependent on the root monitor handle
* Add various functions to the Wayland platform to reduce cfgs
* Don't use a cfg in listen_device_events
* Don't use a cfg in set_content_protected
* Fix instance of a target_os cfg
Removes Xlib code by replacing it with the x11rb equivalent,
the commit handles xrandr, xinput, xinput2, and xkb.
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <dev@notgull.net>
* macOS & iOS: Refactor EventWrapper
* macOS & iOS: Make EventLoopWindowTarget independent of the user event
* iOS: Use MainThreadMarker instead of marking functions unsafe
* Make iOS thread safe
We use raw-window-handle extensive in the public API as well as we
force the users to use it to get some essential data for interop, thus
reexport it.
Fixes: #2913.
Inner panics could make it hard to trouble shoot the issues and for some
users it's not desirable.
The inner panics were left only when they are used to `assert!` during
development.
This reverts commit 9f91bc413fe20618bd7090829832bb074aab15c3 which
reverted the original patch which was merged without a proper review.
Fixes: #500.
Up until now the Android backend has been directly mapping key codes
which essentially just represent the "physical" cap of the key (quoted
since this also related to virtual keyboards).
Since we didn't account for any meta keys either it meant the backend
only supported a 1:1 mapping from key codes, which only covers a tiny
subset of characters. For example you couldn't type a colon since
there's no keycode for that and we didn't try and map Shift+Semicolon
into a colon character.
This has been tricky to support because the `NativeActivity` class doesn't
have direct access to the Java `KeyEvent` object which exposes a more
convenient `getUnicodeChar` API.
It is now possible to query a `KeyCharcterMap` for the device associated
with a `KeyEvent` via the `AndroidApp::device_key_character_map` API
which provides a binding to the SDK `KeyCharacterMap` API in Java:
https://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/KeyCharacterMap
This is effectively what `getUnicodeChar` is implemented based on and is
a bit more general purpose.
`KeyCharacterMap` lets us map a key_code + meta_state from a `KeyEvent`
into either a unicode character or dead key accent that can be combined
with the following key. This mapping is done based on the user's chosen
layout for the keyboard.
To enable support for key character maps the
`AndroidApp::input_events()` API was replaced by
`AndroidApp::input_events_iter()` which returns a (lending) iterator for
events. This was changed because the previous design made it difficult
to allow other AndroidApp APIs to be used while iterating events (mainly
because AndroidApp held a lock over the backend during iteration)
Inner panics could make it hard to trouble shoot the issues and for some
users ints not desirable.
The inner panics were left only when they are used to `assert!` during
development.
At the moment, the with_x11_visual function takes a pointer and
immediately dereferences it to get the visual info inside. As it is safe
to pass a null pointer to this function, it is unsound. This commit
replaces the pointer parameter with a visual ID, and then uses that ID
to look up the actual visual under
the X11 setup. As this is what was already practically happening before,
this change shouldn't cause any performance downgrades.
This is a breaking change, but it's done in the name of soundness so it
should be okay. It should be trivial for end users to accommodate it,
as it's just a matter of getting the visual ID from the pointer to the
visual before passing it in.
Signed-off-by: John Nunley <dev@notgull.net>
There's no need to force the static on the users, given that internally
some backends were not using static in the first place.
Co-authored-by: daxpedda <daxpedda@gmail.com>
