It seems at least with Rust 1.82 (the version in `rust-toolchain.toml`)
these bounds are inferred from the `D: WorkspaceHandler` bound, so they
can be specified only there.
Clients have been updated to use ext-workspace-v1 and
cosmic-workspace-v2.
Removing this should save some duplication of having to update both
cosmic workspace v1 and ext workspace code, and should help with things
like using the same workspace handle when a workspace moves to a
different group (which is something that was changed before the final
version of the ext-workspace-v1 protocol.)
If two displays have the same edid (which shouldn't happen, since edid
includes a serial number, but is somewhat common in practice with
identical monitors), match output stack by comparing both edid and
connector name.
If we get the same edid but a different connector, `set_output`
truncates but also adds the new one. (Before adding edid matching, this
would have just added to the output stack.)
`prefers_output()` will requrire a connector name match if the edid of
the current output is the same as that of the output being compared.
If the user explicitly moves a workspace to an output, assume that is
where the user wants it, so it shouldn't be moved back to a different
output in the future.
For persistent workspaces, the explicitly set workspace is the one that
will be stored, instead of trying to track an unbounded list of outputs
persistently.
This was mapping `UnderlyingStorage::Memory` to `None`. I don't see any
reason for this. Though this also shouldn't change behavior since
`TextureRenderElement` doesn't provide `underlying_storage` currently.
Previously, this was not updating the workspace indices on either the
old or new set, and left no workspace on the old set with `Active`
state. It also didn't add a workspace if the last workspace was removed.
`ext_workspace_handle_v1::coordinates` defines the coordinate as
"an N-dimensional grid within a workspace group". So it is not
expected that the coordinates are unique between different groups, or
establish any geometry between different groups.
Whether we use one workspace per output or allow workspaces to span
outputs in the protocol, the whole workspace group is on the same set of
outputs. So I think this holds in any case.
I don't think we rely on this anywhere.
