Given that we merge all the seats, we should consider that window
is not focused once all seats wl_keyboards are no longer present.
We use seats instead of keyboards to track focus to protect against
wl_keyboard::leave not being delivered when removing the seat
(usually it's not the case though).
Fixes: #3376
Change in state requires a redraw, however drawing when getting
`Occluded` with vsync will block indefinitely, thus the event in
it's current state is rather useless.
To solve this issue winit needs a way to determine whether the user
paused/continued their render loop, so it can commit on their behalf.
This commit also forces redraw when getting configure.
Links: https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit/issues/3442
The user may change the size during the on-going resize, meaning that
the size will desync with winit's internal loop which breaks viewporter
setup with fractional scaling.
Links: https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/7474
There seems to be many PRs relating to this issue, but they don't include all
platforms and for some reason lost steam. This PR again tries to make this
feature happen, and does it for all desktop platforms (x11, wayland, macos,
windows, web).
I think the best user of this feature and the reason I'm doing this is Bevy and
game engines in general. There non laggy hardware cursors with custom images are
very important. Game devs also like their PNGs so supporting platform native
cursor files is not that important, but I guess could be added too.
Co-authored-by: daxpedda <daxpedda@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mads Marquart <mads@marquart.dk>
Co-authored-by: Kirill Chibisov <contact@kchibisov.com>
This protocol is only used for (optional) Client Side Decorations
(where) the compositor still takes the burden of compositing various
window parts together, via subsurfaces that all belong to a single
window.
If this core protocol is not available, as is the case on gamescope,
disable CSD.
The surface was automatically dropped due to new RAII type in SCTK
when dropping the Window, which was not the case at some point with
SCTK.
Thus destroying objects associated with it where causing issues
with some window managers.
Links: https://github.com/neovide/neovide/issues/2109
Keep the user provided size in the original values and convert only
when we're getting a `configure` event. On some compositors will
have a scale available, so it'll work, however with some we'll
still have old 'pick 1` as default.
Also configure_bounds when compositor tells the user to pick the size,
that will ensure that initial `with_inner_size` won't grow beyond the
working area.
Fixes#3187.
Window builder is always accessed by winit on the thread event loop
is on, thus it's safe to mark the data it gets as `Send + Sync`.
Each unsafe object is marked individually as `Send + Sync` instead
of just implementing `Send` and `Sync` for the whole builder.
The update is pretty minor, however we support now
`WindowEvent::Occluded` when xdg-shell v6 is available.
It also adds support for `Window::show_window_menu`.
Fixes#2927.
* Make Linux platforms less dependent on the root monitor handle
* Add various functions to the Wayland platform to reduce cfgs
* Don't use a cfg in listen_device_events
* Don't use a cfg in set_content_protected
* Fix instance of a target_os cfg
Inner panics could make it hard to trouble shoot the issues and for some
users it's not desirable.
The inner panics were left only when they are used to `assert!` during
development.
This reverts commit 9f91bc413fe20618bd7090829832bb074aab15c3 which
reverted the original patch which was merged without a proper review.
Fixes: #500.
Inner panics could make it hard to trouble shoot the issues and for some
users ints not desirable.
The inner panics were left only when they are used to `assert!` during
development.
Mark it as breaking, since some clients relied on that behavior, simply
because dispatching clients queue always woke up a winit, meaning that
they won't be able to use user events for this sake.
Nothing changed from the user point of view, other than they should
use the `raw-window-handle`, which is objectively better, given that
it reduces the amount of `cfg` guards in downstream code.
Lifetimes don't work nicely when dealing with multithreaded environments
in the current design of the existing winit's event handling model, so
remove it in favor of `InnerSizeWriter` fences passed to client, so they
could try to update the size.
Fixes#1387.
The idea that redraw events are dispatched with a specific ordering
that makes it possible to specifically report when we have finished
dispatching redraw events isn't portable and the way in which we
dispatched RedrawEventsCleared was inconsistent across backends.
More generally speaking, there is no inherent relationship between
redrawing and event loop iterations. An event loop may wake up at any
frequency depending on what sources of input events are being listened
to but redrawing is generally throttled and in some way synchronized
with the display frequency.
Similarly there's no inherent relationship between a single event loop
iteration and the dispatching of any specific kind of "main" event.
An event loop wakes up when there are events to read (e.g. input
events or responses from a display server / compositor) and goes back
to waiting when there's nothing else to read.
There isn't really a special kind of "main" event that is dispatched
in order with respect to other events.
What we can do more portably is emit an event when the event loop
is about to block and wait for new events.
In practice this is very similar to how MainEventsCleared was
implemented except it wasn't the very last event previously since
redraw events could be dispatched afterwards.
The main backend where we don't strictly know when we're going to
wait for events is Web (since the real event loop is internal to
the browser). For now we emulate AboutToWait on Web similar to how
MainEventsCleared was dispatched.
In practice most applications almost certainly shouldn't care about
AboutToWait because the frequency of event loop iterations is
essentially arbitrary and usually irrelevant.
Considering the possibility of re-running an event loop via run_ondemand
then it's more correct to say that the loop is about to exit without
assuming it's going to be destroyed.
This renames all internal implementations of pump_events_with_timeout
to pump_events and makes them public.
Since all platforms that support pump_events support timeouts there's
no need to have a separate API.
