There seems to be many PRs relating to this issue, but they don't include all
platforms and for some reason lost steam. This PR again tries to make this
feature happen, and does it for all desktop platforms (x11, wayland, macos,
windows, web).
I think the best user of this feature and the reason I'm doing this is Bevy and
game engines in general. There non laggy hardware cursors with custom images are
very important. Game devs also like their PNGs so supporting platform native
cursor files is not that important, but I guess could be added too.
Co-authored-by: daxpedda <daxpedda@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mads Marquart <mads@marquart.dk>
Co-authored-by: Kirill Chibisov <contact@kchibisov.com>
Split `Key` into clear categories, like `Named`, `Dead`, Character`, `Unidentified`
removing the `#[non_exhaustive]` from the `Key` itself.
Similar action was done for the `KeyCode`.
Fixes: #2995
Co-authored-by: Kirill Chibisov <contact@kchibisov.com>
Window builder is always accessed by winit on the thread event loop
is on, thus it's safe to mark the data it gets as `Send + Sync`.
Each unsafe object is marked individually as `Send + Sync` instead
of just implementing `Send` and `Sync` for the whole builder.
Add a method to request a system menu. The implementation
is provided only on Windows for now.
Co-authored-by: daxpedda <daxpedda@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kirill Chibisov <contact@kchibisov.com>
* Make Linux platforms less dependent on the root monitor handle
* Add various functions to the Wayland platform to reduce cfgs
* Don't use a cfg in listen_device_events
* Don't use a cfg in set_content_protected
* Fix instance of a target_os cfg
Inner panics could make it hard to trouble shoot the issues and for some
users it's not desirable.
The inner panics were left only when they are used to `assert!` during
development.
This reverts commit 9f91bc413fe20618bd7090829832bb074aab15c3 which
reverted the original patch which was merged without a proper review.
Fixes: #500.
Inner panics could make it hard to trouble shoot the issues and for some
users ints not desirable.
The inner panics were left only when they are used to `assert!` during
development.
There's no need to force the static on the users, given that internally
some backends were not using static in the first place.
Co-authored-by: daxpedda <daxpedda@gmail.com>
Lifetimes don't work nicely when dealing with multithreaded environments
in the current design of the existing winit's event handling model, so
remove it in favor of `InnerSizeWriter` fences passed to client, so they
could try to update the size.
Fixes#1387.
The idea that redraw events are dispatched with a specific ordering
that makes it possible to specifically report when we have finished
dispatching redraw events isn't portable and the way in which we
dispatched RedrawEventsCleared was inconsistent across backends.
More generally speaking, there is no inherent relationship between
redrawing and event loop iterations. An event loop may wake up at any
frequency depending on what sources of input events are being listened
to but redrawing is generally throttled and in some way synchronized
with the display frequency.
Similarly there's no inherent relationship between a single event loop
iteration and the dispatching of any specific kind of "main" event.
An event loop wakes up when there are events to read (e.g. input
events or responses from a display server / compositor) and goes back
to waiting when there's nothing else to read.
There isn't really a special kind of "main" event that is dispatched
in order with respect to other events.
What we can do more portably is emit an event when the event loop
is about to block and wait for new events.
In practice this is very similar to how MainEventsCleared was
implemented except it wasn't the very last event previously since
redraw events could be dispatched afterwards.
The main backend where we don't strictly know when we're going to
wait for events is Web (since the real event loop is internal to
the browser). For now we emulate AboutToWait on Web similar to how
MainEventsCleared was dispatched.
In practice most applications almost certainly shouldn't care about
AboutToWait because the frequency of event loop iterations is
essentially arbitrary and usually irrelevant.
Considering the possibility of re-running an event loop via run_ondemand
then it's more correct to say that the loop is about to exit without
assuming it's going to be destroyed.
Some systems could resize the window immediately and we'd rather
inform the users right away if that was the case, so they could
create e.g. EGLSurface without waiting for resize, which is really
important for Wayland.
Fixes#2868.
